Times Responds to Macedonians' Complaints About "Slav" Reference
July 15, 2006
|How one small adjective spelt trouble abroad
LAST week I wrote about the near-impossibility of failing to offend someone, somewhere, in the pages of a daily newspaper. Foreign stories extend the
possibilities dramatically. On July 6 our European correspondent, Anthony Browne, opened a report under the headline “Former boxer becomes Macedonian
Prime Minister” with the words: “A Slav nationalist former boxer and amateur actor has been elected Prime Minister of the troubled state of Macedonia
after a campaign marred by violence in a region still volatile with ethnic tensions.”
That little word “Slav” opened the floodgates. Typical of the complaints was this from John Skenderis in Canada: “Please refrain from using the term
‘Slav’ to describe Macedonians in future articles. As a Canadian of Macedonian descent I find this term insulting, and I would ask that you refer to
the people of Macedonia as Macedonians.” When I consulted Anthony, he reported that much to his amazement angry e-mails had flooded in to him from
around the world and he was being denounced on Macedonian websites. On the other hand, he had also received letters from Greeks congratulating him on
referring to the Macedonian majority as Slavs — Greece still objects to Macedonia’s use of what it considers a Hellenic name. “It’s the first time
I’ve been so unwittingly controversial,” he said.
Actually Anthony did not refer to all Macedonians as Slavs, which would indeed have been incorrect. The term Slav is defined in the Oxford English
Dictionary as “a member of a group of peoples in Central and Eastern Europe speaking Slavic languages”. It defines Macedonian as a Slavic language.
Hence all Macedonian-speaking citizens (the majority) are Slavs (Albanian-speaking citizens of Macedonia are not, Albanian being an Indo-European
language), and our Europe correspondent was correct to thus describe the new Prime Minister. He meant no offence by it, being unaware of all the
complexities of Macedonian nationhood.
In matters of ethnicity and nationality in volatile regions, it seems there are no longer any innocent adjectives, for those with a particular
political or racial agenda to push. In this instance we have quite inadvertently pleased Greece, insulted Macedonia, and raised international
tensions a fraction.